ISBN: 0-941690-85-7

Debating Darwin;
Adventures of a Scholar
(Revised Edition)
Bibliographical data, notes, index, CIP

In this book John C. Greene, author of The Death of Adam, Darwin and the Modern World View, and Science, Ideology, and World View, draws together a series of essays, old and new, on the origins and cultural impact of Charles Darwin’s ideas. He also enters into an epistolary dialogue with two leading evolutionary biologists, Theodosius Dobzhansky and Ernst Mayr, on the historical, philosophical, and religious aspects of this major revolution in Western thought and feeling. As a historian Greene challenges Mayr’s account of the rise of evolutionary ideas and advances his own interpretation.

Debating Darwin is a wonderful evocation of a lifetime of relentless questioning of the larger pretensions of many Darwinians to offer a generally satisfying account of man's place in nature on purely scientific grounds. Greene is no fundamentalist. He is not interested in denying the scientific credentials of the theory of evolution. Always respectful of the purely scientific achievements of those he criticizes, he is nonetheless anxious to demonstrate how far beyond these achievements they have frequently strayed in their efforts to resolve larger philosophical, religious and social questions.

“The key to Greene's criticisms is his account of the relationship between science and worldview. For Greene, empirical study of the world is always undertaken in the context of a larger set of assumptions about the nature of reality, or a worldview. A worldview is not in itself scientific; rather, it is the precondition for particular kinds of scientific inquiry. Greene's complaint against many Darwinians is that they pretend to derive from their science a range of conclusions about the nature and significance of human life that their worldview is incapable of supporting.…

“Debating Darwin recounts a series of arguments of this kind that Greene has conducted with evolutionary biologists over the years. …In each case the historian gently rebukes the biologist for 'cheating' by importing into his account of evolution ideas that have no place in the Darwinian worldview, in each case the biologist protests he is being misunderstood and in each case the historian and biologist agree to disagree and remain good friends….

“His key insight is: ‘Every great scientific synthesis stimulates efforts to view the whole of reality in its terms, and Darwin's theory of natural selection was no exception. But the views of reality that originate in this way are not themselves scientific, nor are they subject to scientific verification’.”

——New York Times
 “Greene, an Episcopalian, rejects the notion that scientific explanations are total explanations and that nature as known to science exhausts reality. In particular, he finds the efforts of leading Darwinists to derive knowledge of human duty and destiny from evolutionary biology unconvincing. Moreover, his rhetorical analysis of leading evolutionary thinkers’ works indicates that they have resisted the notion of a purposeless world stripped of meaning and value, despite the logic of neo-Darwinistic positivism. Predictably, Greene’s views were not always received with enthusiasm, but they did bring him into extended correspondence with two of the towering figures in twentieth-century Darwinain thought: Theodosius Dobzhansky and Ernst Mayr. One of the great virtues of Debating Darwin is the reprinting of a good deal of this correspondence… along with essays which provide the context for the exchanges.”

——Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith

“…His [Greene’s] pointed criticisms of Darwinism as a worldview brought him into dialogue and controversy with two great evolutionary theorists; first with Theodosius Dobzhansky, starting in 1959, and 20 years later with Ernst Mayr. Much of the exchanged correspondence is included in Debating Darwin, combined with ten essays critically probing the writings of Dobzhansky, Mayr, and other evolutionary giants, conveyed without the guarded language of writings intended for publication, confronting, impatiently at times, the historical and philosophical sophistication of a peer, who shows himself as a much less than adoring, even if admiring, critic of Darwin and later evolutionary theorists….

Greene correctly argues,…that evolutionists (other scientists as well) often see biological evolution as a source of meaning and value in the world, and thus transgress the scope of science. As he sees it, scientists affirm that scientific knowledge is “objective”, but then proceed to argue, when the opportunity arises, that evolution furnishes, or at the least justifies, an optimistic view of the world, as well as moral and other values that most of us accept and live by. Greene does not buy this “justification”. What these scientists are doing, he says, is bringing in Christian and other western values and seeking their justification in biological evolution. One could say at best, he argues, that biological evolution (more generally, scientific knowledge) is “consistent” with such values. (It is, however, of some social consequence to point out that evolution is compatible with Christian values, rather than seeing the two in contradiction, as some fundamentalists and others would have it in order to justify their attacks against the teaching of evolution in the schools.) Greene’s overarching concern, however, is the de facto transformation of scientific knowledge, necessarily materialistic, into a materialistic worldview. One can accept the evolutionary origin of humans and other organisms with implying that evolution (science) conveys all that we may want to know about human life and the universe.

Debating Darwin is illuminating as we consider the distinctively American, and seemingly endless, controversies on the teaching of evolution in the schools. There are those who would deny, on Biblical or other grounds, that evolution has occurred. Greene is far removed from this position.…”

——Biology and Philosophy

“…No matter what the reader may feel about Greene’s searching for God in Darwin, it is good to have these essays together under one cover to show the evolution of Greene’s debate. The book is highly recommended to anyone interested in following a reasonable man’s quest to understand the relationships between God, science, and humanity.”

——Journal of the History of Biology

“One can only wish that the discipline of intellectual history would be more densely populated with the likes of John C. Greene, who combines extensive knowledge of the history of ideas with working knowledge of evolution, conveyed in lucid and effective prose.”

Francisco J. Ayala, The Quarterly Review of Biology

 ABOUT THE AUTHOR: John C. Greene is Professor Emeritus in the Department of History at the University of Connecticut, Storrs. A former Guggenheim Fellow, he is best known for his writings on the interaction of science and world view in the rise and development of evolutionary thought.

John C. Greene. 289 pages (HB)                            Price $ 34.95
  (1999, 2001)                                                                   

REGINA        BOOKS
P. O. Box 280     Claremont, CA 91711     (909) 624-8466     Fax:  909-626-1345
Publisher
Richard D. Burns, Ph.D.
rdburns@reginabooks.com
Marketing Director
Glenda F. Burns
gfburns@reginabooks.com
Internet Technical Support
Donald E. Werve, Jr.
dwerve2@reginabooks.com